I have to admit that
the gospel passage set for today is not one of my favourites. I find
it gives a very odd picture of God, as though God is only waiting for
us to feel the slightest bit of resentment against someone as an
excuse not to forgive us.
Well, that isn't
like the God I know, so why did Jesus tell this story? We know from
elsewhere, the Lord's prayer, for instance, that we need to forgive
before we are forgiven, but why? What difference does it
make to us?
Well, let's look at
the story in context.
The story comes in a
selection of Jesus' teaching, including the story of the lost sheep,
and the bit where Jesus says what to do if someone sins against you.
You may have thought about this last week: first of all you talk to
them privately, then if they won't listen, you take someone else
along for moral support, then you take the matter to the church, and
if all else fails, you, quote, treat him as though he were a pagan or
tax collector, unquote. Although given how Jesus was prone to treat
pagans and tax collectors, loving them into the Kingdom of God, I
don’t think he actually meant to shun them!
But then Peter comes
along, probably in a tearing rage, and wants to know how many times
you have to forgive someone. I wonder who'd been getting on his
nerves! It sounds like someone had. And Jesus says, not just seven
times, the way the Jewish law says, but uncountable times. Seventy
times seven; you'd lose count long before you got that far. And then
he tells this story.
So, what does this
story mean?
I think we are
supposed to see ourselves as the person who owed the king a fortune,
and the other servant is someone who has hurt or upset us in some
way. I suppose that Jesus is saying that no matter how much someone
else may offend us or hurt us, it's nothing compared with how much we
need God's forgiveness.
But then, what is
forgiveness? In this context, it is described as letting someone off
a debt. But, like everything to do with Christianity, there is a lot
more to it than that. It is more than just allowing us not to pay
the penalty for what we have done wrong. It has to do with healing
and reinstatement and generally being made whole.
Because sin isn't so
much about what we do – although that too, of course - but also
about who we are. Let's face it, most of us here today would not go
out and deliberately commit a dreadful sin, or not most of the time,
anyway. But we know that deep down we are not whole. We are not
perfect. We need God's grace, and his healing, and his love if we
are to come anywhere near being the person he designed us to be.
For me, confession
isn't so much a matter of saying "I'm sorry," but more a
matter of facing up to who I am: yes I am the kind of person
who would do this; no I'm not perfect; yes, I do need Jesus. And, of
course, so does everyone else.
As I'm sure you
know, most people who commit crimes seem to do so out of their own
inadequacy. That doesn't excuse them, or anything, but it does help
to explain it. Because we, too, are inadequate people, although
possibly less inadequate than someone who goes round knocking old
women on the head.
Everyone needs God.
You do, I do, those who attack people simply because of the colour of
their skin do. Because it is only through God that we can become
whole people. And, just as we need to accept ourselves for who we
are, so we need to accept other people for who they are. In
fact more so, because while we can decide we need to change,
and we can do something about ourselves, with God's help, we cannot
make that decision for others. Other people must make their own
decision. We can't force someone else to become a Christian, or to
stop drinking, or lose weight, or come off drugs, or anything else.
We can, of course, ensure they do no harm to others, and we can offer
them opportunities to change, but we can't force them to.
You remember the
story of the Prodigal son, I expect. The son who asked for his share
of inheritance and went into the world to have some fun, and when he
was in the gutter decided to go home again. And the father ran to
meet him, and put on a massive celebration for him, and had obviously
been longing and longing and longing for his son to come home again.
But the father
couldn't make the son come home. He had to wait until the son chose
to come home of his own free will. What's more, the son had to
accept that his father wanted him home again. He could have said
"Well, no, I don't deserve all this," and rushed off to
live in the stables, behaving like a servant, although his father
wanted to treat him as the son he was. The son had to receive his
father's forgiveness, just as we do.
And don't forget,
either, the elder brother, who simply couldn't join in the
celebrations because he couldn't forgive his brother. How dare they
celebrate for that lousy rotter! I don't know whether he was crosser
with his father for having a party, or with his brother for daring to
come home. I feel sorry for him, because he allowed his bitterness to
spoil what could have been a good time.
And that is exactly
what happens to us when we do not forgive one another. We allow our
bitterness to spoil what could have been a good time with God.
So how do we forgive
others? Sometimes it just doesn't seem possible that we can ever
manage to forgive someone. But we must, or we can't make any further
progress in our journey towards wholeness. Well, the only way I have
ever found that works is to pray about it. God is a terrific person
to pour all your bitterness and anger out on to. God can take it.
And if you are really honest with him about your feelings, some
surprising things can happen. You might find, for instance, that it
isn't really the other person you are angry with, it is you. Or
perhaps it's God himself you need to forgive, and that can be
difficult, too.
I remember, years
ago, being very angry with God after someone I loved had died in an
accident – God could have prevented the accident, God could have
healed her, and so on. I remember saying to someone that I hoped I
managed to work through my grief soon because it would be nice to be
able to pray about something else for a change!
The thing is, when
we come to God and admit we are angry, or hurt, or upset, by someone
or something that has happened, God doesn't tell us that we mustn't
feel like that, or that we are very wrong to feel like that, or even
that this isn't how we're really feeling. God isn't like that. God
enters into our pain, and shares it. Oh, it might be pointed out
that you are indulging in a fit of self-pity, if that's what is
happening – all too easy, don't you agree! – but he does
sympathise and he does listen.
And as we go on
praying, something happens. We let go of the self-pity – that is
always the first to go – and we gradually work through the anger,
and the pain, and the sorrow, and, next thing we know, we have
forgiven whoever it was we needed to forgive.
The acid test for me
is if I can ask God to bless someone who hurt me, and mean it. And
could I see them at a Communion service and wish them God's peace?
It's surprising how often I can, if I have prayed.
So, then. We need
to forgive other people, we need to forgive ourselves, and
occasionally we need to forgive God himself before we can receive
God's forgiveness. It isn't that God won't forgive us - heavens,
God's forgiveness is as constant and unremitting as all of God's
character – it is that we can't receive God's forgiveness if we are
full of bitterness and pain and anger. There's no room to let God in
if we are too busy holding on to our own feelings.
The debtor, in
Jesus' story, hadn't really grasped what the King had done for him.
He hadn't hauled in that he had been forgiven his debt. He went on
acting as though nothing had happened, which is why he required his
debtor to pay him back. He was too busy focussing on his own
feelings, and hadn't really grasped that he was now free from debt,
his burden had rolled away, so he should help other people lose their
burdens.
It's only really
when we are prepared to put our own feelings down that there is room
for God to act. I remind you, too, that in our first reading Paul
tells us not to be snooty about our brothers and sisters who are
Christians in a different way from us, or who have scruples about
things that we don't have scruples about, like sex or divorce, or same sex marriage,
for instance. "Who are you to pass judgement on servants of
another? It is before their own lord that they stand or fall. And
they will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make them stand."
In other words, what they do is none of our business, and we need not
to judge them.
Basically, when it
comes to other people, we must put down our own feelings and think of
theirs. And that way, we make room for God to act.
So, is there anyone
you need to forgive this morning? Do you need to forgive yourself?
Do you need to forgive God?
You may have noticed
that we haven't had a prayer of penitence yet. We're going to, now.
Let's take a few moments of quietness, and then I'll lead us in
prayer.
I expect you know
that the Gospels were only written down about 50 or 60 years after
Jesus’ death. A lot of things happened during those years, of
course, and although we know how accurate oral transmission can be,
there are a few places where it looks as though an extraneous passage
got inserted. I don’t quite mean extraneous, I don’t think –
but a passage attributed to Jesus that perhaps wasn’t what he
actually said, but what the early Church thought he ought to have
said. And part of the passage we heard just now is, I think, one of
those passages, mostly because it talks about the Church, a gathering
of Christians – and such a thing didn’t exist in Jesus’ day.
But whatever, it got into our Bibles, so we need to read it and learn
from it.
It does seem, at
first reading, extraordinary, though. We know from elsewhere that
Jesus tells us never to put limits on our forgiveness. We know we
must forgive, or it’s impossible for us to receive God’s
forgiveness, we block ourselves off from it.
And we are told
never to judge. We’re told to sort out what’s wrong with
ourselves first – you remember how Jesus graphically told us to
remove the very large log from our own eyes before we could possibly
deal with the tiny speck that bothered us in someone else’s.
But we are human.
No matter how much we want to love our neighbours as ourselves, it’s
difficult. It’s easy enough to love suffering humanity en masse,
to send a text to a certain number to give three pounds towards
relieving some kind of community suffering somewhere else. It’s
easy enough to throw an extra box of tea-bags into the food bank box
at Tesco’s, or to donate to the Brixton soup kitchen. It’s even
relatively easy to do small things to lower your carbon footprint –
to take reusable produce bags to the supermarket, to be scrupulous
about recycling, and so on.
Now, don’t get me
wrong, all these are good and right and proper things to be doing,
and we should probably all do them more than we actually do. But
they are all relatively easy – the difficult bit comes when we have
to start interacting with other people, and loving them. “To love
the world to me’s no chore. My problem is that lot next door!”
That’s when we’re apt to forget to be loving, when we are apt to
go our own way, when we’re apt to hurt people, most probably
totally unintentionally. The careless word, the accidental insult –
or even, sadly, the intentional one.
Now, obviously, if
we realise we’ve hurt someone, the thing to do is to apologise at
once. Sometimes there are times when we don’t really want to
apologise – they started it, it was their fault. Well, even if it
is, we are the ones who need to apologise, if only because it makes
us bigger than them…. Well, perhaps not for that reason, but you
know what I mean.
But what if it is
they who hurt you? The human thing to do is to hit out and hurt them
back, but we’re not supposed to do that, and with God’s help we
won’t. This passage tells us what to do – first, go and explain
what has gone wrong, and if they agree and apologise, all is well and
no harm done. Then you take a couple of friends along to witness
that you had a problem and to try and help you be reconciled, and
then, finally, take it to the church. The church, note – not the
world! And then, the passage says, if they still won’t listen, let
them be to you as a tax gatherer or a gentile. Which, on first
reading, sounds as if you should shun them completely, which was how
Jewish people of the time behaved towards them.
But Jesus didn’t,
did he? Remember the story of Levi, who was a tax collector, and
Jesus called him to become one of the disciples. Remember Zaccheus,
who resolved to pay back anybody he had cheated after Jesus loved and
forgave him and went to eat with him. Remember how many times he
talked with, and healed, Gentiles, non-Jews, people who observant
Jews would have nothing to do with.
So what is the
church to do with those who won’t see that they’ve hurt someone,
or if they do see it, don’t care? From Jesus’ example, it looks
as though we have to go on loving them, trusting them, and caring for
them. Heaven, as one paraphrase puts it, will back us up.
Obviously, there are very rare occasions when steps have to be taken,
if a child or a vulnerable adult is at risk, for example, but mostly
things can be put right without that. And even when steps do have to
be taken – and the Methodist church has systems in place to
organise such steps, so our safeguarding people know what to do –
we still have a duty to love and care for the perpetrator.
Now, the next part
of the passage is really not easy to understand. If, says Jesus, or
the Church speaking in Jesus’ name, two or three agree on anything
in prayer, it will be granted. But we know that, with the best will
in the world, this doesn’t always happen. We have all seen times
when our prayers, far from being answered, appear to have gone no
further than the ceiling. But then again, were we only looking for
one answer to our prayer? Were we telling God what to do, as, I
don’t know about you, but I find I’m rather apt to. Were we just
talking at God, and not trying to listen, trying to be part of what
God is doing in the world? All too easily done, I’m afraid.
But the final
sentence – ah, now that brings hope. “For where two or three
come together in my name, I am there with them.”
You see, in the
Jewish faith, you need what’s called a minyan, a minimum of ten
people – in many traditions, ten men, not people. If there are
only nine of you, you can’t go ahead with the service. But not for
we Christians. We know that even if there are only a couple of us,
Jesus will be there with us and enabling our worship.
And that, in these
strange times, is very comforting. We haven’t been able to meet
together for worship for so long – I was supposed to be coming to
you on March the 29th of this year, but of course I
couldn’t. Couldn’t have, anyway, as I was ill with this wretched
virus and couldn’t even get out of bed at that stage! And now it
is September, five months later, and at last I can be with you. But
we are still restricted, and if the pandemic gets worse again, we may
well be stopped from meeting again for a time. But even if we have
to restrict ourselves to our so-called “bubbles”, we know that
Jesus will be there with us.
I noticed, didn’t
you, how much God was there during the worst of the pandemic. The
ministers of the various denominations, and often the congregation,
too, worked so very hard to stream services so that we could join in
from home. We sometimes watched three services in one day – the
one David and his cohorts put on from the Southwark and Deptford
circuit, then I very often watched the service my mother’s church
put out – especially if my mother or sister were reading the lesson
– and a couple of times watched the service from my daughter’s
church, as she was terribly clever about mixing the choir’s solo
singing so it sounded like the choir, and once one of my grandsons
was leading the Lord’s Prayer. And I know there were many, many
other services we could have watched – and an awful lot of people
did, people who perhaps wouldn’t have dreamt of going to church
under normal circumstances.
And there were –
and still are – Zoom fellowship meetings, and on other platforms,
people have met for worship from many different countries around the
world. It is amazing how God has kept his people together in these
difficult times. I do wonder, don’t you, what this is saying about
being Church, not just in the middle of a pandemic, but going
forward. Many churches, I think, will continue to stream their
services as a matter of course. Many more will consider having their
various committee meetings on Zoom, which, quite apart from anything
else, means you don’t have to rush through your supper and have
indigestion, and the meetings finish much earlier!
But, and of course
there’s a but, because there’s always a but, this is reserved for
those who have the technology to join in – not everybody has
broadband at home, or unlimited data on their phones. In some
countries, even having a phone would be a privilege. We say “This
is where God was in the pandemic”, and I think that’s true –
but we also have to remember those places where they really did have
to rely on just their immediate families for fellowship, as there was
no other option. And we know that, even if it was just a husband and
wife together, Jesus was there with them. As he is with us now, and
will be whenever two or three of us meet in worship. Amen.
Welcome! I am a Methodist Local Preacher, and preach roughly once a month, or thereabouts. If you wish to take a RSS feed, or become a follower, so that you know when a new sermon has been uploaded, please feel free to do so.
Please comment if the sermons have met with you where you are!