powered by podcast garden
“Son of man, can
these bones live?”
Today’s readings are,
of course, about resurrection.
About returning to life.
Ezekiel in the valley of the bones,
About returning to life.
Ezekiel in the valley of the bones,
and Jesus with his
friends in their distress.
Can you imagine a field
of bones?
We’ve all seen skeletons on television, of course,
We’ve all seen skeletons on television, of course,
and some of us may have
visited ossuaries on the continent,
which are usually
memorials to soldiers who fell in the first world war,
and they put the bones
of soldiers who have got separated from their identity into the
ossuaries to honour them.
Robert and I might
visit the one near Verdun at the end of our holiday next month –
we've been there before, and it's very impressive.
And the older ones among us may remember seeing pictures of a huge pile of bones in Cambodia after the Pol Pot atrocities of the 1970s.
I think Ezekiel, in his
vision, must have seen something like that.
A huge pile of skulls and bones….
A huge pile of skulls and bones….
“Son of man, can
these bones live?”
And, at God’s
command, Ezekiel prophesied to the bones,
and then he saw the
skeletons fitting themselves together like a jigsaw puzzle,
and then internal
organs and tendons and muscle and fat and skin growing on the bare
skeletons.
I’m sure I’ve seen some kind of computer animation like that on television, haven’t you?
But for Ezekiel, it must have been totally weird,
I’m sure I’ve seen some kind of computer animation like that on television, haven’t you?
But for Ezekiel, it must have been totally weird,
unless he was in one of
those dream-states where it’s all rational.
But once the skeletons
had come together and grown bodies, things were still not right.
Do you ever watch those
television programmes where they try to build up an image of the
person from his or her skull? They are very clever about it – the
most recent one I saw was a reconstruction of Richard III's head, but
I think it owed more to a famous portrait of him.
The trouble is, of course, that it never looks much like a real live person, but more like those photo-fit reconstructions that the police build up from people’s descriptions of villains.
And I never think the
dinosaurs that they show you that they have reconstructed from
computer graphics look very alive, either.
They are very much
better than they used to be, which wouldn't be difficult, and
computer animation has come a long way in recent years.
The trouble is, though, that it is only a computer animation.
They are not films of real animals, and it does show, rather.
The trouble is, though, that it is only a computer animation.
They are not films of real animals, and it does show, rather.
I was watching a
children's programme with my grandson the other day, and I was
impressed with how much these things have improved in recent years,
but they are still not quite like real animals.
The difference, in both
the head reconstructions and the dinosaur programmes is that there is
no life.
No spirit, no personality looking out through the eyes.
No spirit, no personality looking out through the eyes.
And that’s what
Ezekiel saw in his vision –
there were just so many plastic models lying there, no life, no spirit.
Ezekiel had to preach to them again, and they eventually came to life as a vast army.
there were just so many plastic models lying there, no life, no spirit.
Ezekiel had to preach to them again, and they eventually came to life as a vast army.
And then Ezekiel was
told the interpretation of his vision –
it was a prophecy of what God was going to do for Israel, which at the time seemed dead and buried.
God was going to bring Israel back to life, to breathe new life into the nation, and put His Spirit into them.
it was a prophecy of what God was going to do for Israel, which at the time seemed dead and buried.
God was going to bring Israel back to life, to breathe new life into the nation, and put His Spirit into them.
===oo0oo===
I’ll come back to
Ezekiel in a minute, but for now, let’s go on to the wonderful
story of Lazarus.
The family at Bethany
has many links in the Bible.
Some people have identified Mary as the woman who poured ointment all over Jesus’ feet in the house of Simon the Leper –
and because he lived in Bethany,
Some people have identified Mary as the woman who poured ointment all over Jesus’ feet in the house of Simon the Leper –
and because he lived in Bethany,
some people have also
said that he was married to Martha.
We don’t know.
We don’t know.
The Bible isn't very
clear about which Mary was which,
apart from Mary the
Mother of God,
and it certainly
doesn't say that Martha and Simon were married to each other,
although both of them probably were married.
We do know that Martha and Mary were sisters,
We do know that Martha and Mary were sisters,
and that they had a
beloved brother, called Lazarus.
We do know that on one occasion Mary poured her expensive perfume all over the feet of the Lord –
whether this was the same Mary as in the other accounts or a different one isn't clear
But whatever, they seem to have been a family that Jesus knew well,
We do know that on one occasion Mary poured her expensive perfume all over the feet of the Lord –
whether this was the same Mary as in the other accounts or a different one isn't clear
But whatever, they seem to have been a family that Jesus knew well,
a home where he knew he
was welcome,
and dear friends whose
grief he shared when Lazarus died.
In some ways the story
“works” better if the woman who poured ointment on Jesus’ feet
in the house of Simon the Leper and this Mary are one and the same
person,
as we know that the
woman in Simon’s house was, or had been,
some kind of loose
woman that a pious Jew wouldn’t normally associate with.
Now she has repented and been forgiven,
Now she has repented and been forgiven,
and simply adores
Jesus,
who made that possible
for her.
And she seems to have been taken back into her sister’s household,
And she seems to have been taken back into her sister’s household,
possibly rather on
sufferance.
But then she does
nothing but sit at Jesus’ feet, listening to him.
Back then, this simply was Not Done.
Only men were thought to be able to learn,
Back then, this simply was Not Done.
Only men were thought to be able to learn,
women were supposed not
to be capable.
Actually, I have a feeling that the Jews thought that only Jewish free men were able to learn.
They would thank God each morning that they had not been made a woman, a slave or a Gentile.
And even though St Paul had sufficient insight to be able to write that “In Christ, there is neither male nor female, slave nor free, Jew nor Gentile”, thus at a stroke disposing of the prayer he’d been taught to make daily, it’s taken us all a very long time to work that out,
Actually, I have a feeling that the Jews thought that only Jewish free men were able to learn.
They would thank God each morning that they had not been made a woman, a slave or a Gentile.
And even though St Paul had sufficient insight to be able to write that “In Christ, there is neither male nor female, slave nor free, Jew nor Gentile”, thus at a stroke disposing of the prayer he’d been taught to make daily, it’s taken us all a very long time to work that out,
and some would say we
haven’t succeeded, even now.
Anyway, the point is
that Mary, by sitting at Jesus’ feet like that,
was behaving in rather
an outrageous fashion.
Totally blatant, like throwing herself at him.
He might have felt extremely uncomfortable,
Totally blatant, like throwing herself at him.
He might have felt extremely uncomfortable,
and it’s quite
possible that his disciples did.
Martha certainly did, which was one of the reasons why she asked Jesus to send Mary through to help in the kitchen.
Martha certainly did, which was one of the reasons why she asked Jesus to send Mary through to help in the kitchen.
But Jesus
replied:
“Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her.”
“Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her.”
Mary, with all her
history, was now thirsty for the Word of God.
Jesus was happy enough with bread and cheese, or the equivalent;
he didn’t want a huge and complicated meal.
He wanted to be able to give Mary what she needed,
Jesus was happy enough with bread and cheese, or the equivalent;
he didn’t want a huge and complicated meal.
He wanted to be able to give Mary what she needed,
the teaching that only
he could provide.
He would have liked to have given it to Martha, too,
He would have liked to have given it to Martha, too,
but Martha wasn’t
ready.
Not then.
Not then.
But now….. now it’s
all different.
Lazarus, the beloved brother, has been taken ill and died.
It’s awful, isn’t it, when people die very suddenly?
I know we’d all rather go quickly rather than linger for years getting more and more helpless and senile,
Lazarus, the beloved brother, has been taken ill and died.
It’s awful, isn’t it, when people die very suddenly?
I know we’d all rather go quickly rather than linger for years getting more and more helpless and senile,
but it’s a horrible
shock for those left behind.
And, so it seems, Lazarus wasn’t ill for very long, only a couple of days.
And he dies.
And, so it seems, Lazarus wasn’t ill for very long, only a couple of days.
And he dies.
It must have been awful
for them.
Where was Jesus?
They had sent for him, begged him to come, but he wasn’t there.
He didn’t even come for the funeral –
which, in that culture and climate, had to happen at once,
Where was Jesus?
They had sent for him, begged him to come, but he wasn’t there.
He didn’t even come for the funeral –
which, in that culture and climate, had to happen at once,
ideally the same
day.
The two women, and their families if they had them, were observing the Jewish custom of “sitting Shiva”,
The two women, and their families if they had them, were observing the Jewish custom of “sitting Shiva”,
sitting on low stools
indoors while their friends and neighbours came to condole with them
and, I believe, bring
them food and stuff so that the bereaved didn’t have to bother.
But Martha, hearing
that Jesus is on his way, runs out to meet him.
This time it is she who abandons custom and propriety to get closer to Jesus.
And it is she who declares her faith in Him:
“Yes, Lord, I believe that you are the Christ,
This time it is she who abandons custom and propriety to get closer to Jesus.
And it is she who declares her faith in Him:
“Yes, Lord, I believe that you are the Christ,
the Son of God, who is
come into this world!”
And Mary, too, asserts
that if Jesus had been there,
Lazarus would not have
died.
But it is Martha, practical Martha, who overcomes her doubts about removing the gravestone –
four days dead, that was going to smell rather, wasn’t it?
But she orders it removed, and Jesus calls Lazarus forth.
But it is Martha, practical Martha, who overcomes her doubts about removing the gravestone –
four days dead, that was going to smell rather, wasn’t it?
But she orders it removed, and Jesus calls Lazarus forth.
And he comes, still
wrapped in the bandages they used for preparing a body for
burial.
When Jesus is raised, some weeks or months later, the grave-clothes are left behind, but we are told that this didn’t happen to Lazarus.
The people watching had to help him out of the grave-clothes.
When Jesus is raised, some weeks or months later, the grave-clothes are left behind, but we are told that this didn’t happen to Lazarus.
The people watching had to help him out of the grave-clothes.
===oo0oo===
Of course, I think the
point of these two stories –
and the point of linking them together in the lectionary –
is fairly obvious.
Life comes from God.
and the point of linking them together in the lectionary –
is fairly obvious.
Life comes from God.
In Ezekiel’s vision,
God had to breathe life into the fitted-together skeletons,
or they were no more
than computer animations,
or dressmakers’
dummies.
And it was God who, through Jesus, raised Lazarus from the dead.
And it was God who, through Jesus, raised Lazarus from the dead.
Without God, Ezekiel’s
skeletons would have remained just random collections of bones.
I think that this was a dream or a vision, rather than something that actually happened, but it makes an important point, even still.
God said to Ezekiel that just as, in the dream, he had breathed life into the skeletons, so he would breathe new life into the people of Israel.
I think that this was a dream or a vision, rather than something that actually happened, but it makes an important point, even still.
God said to Ezekiel that just as, in the dream, he had breathed life into the skeletons, so he would breathe new life into the people of Israel.
And the story of
Lazarus, of course, foreshadows the even greater resurrection of
Jesus himself,
a resurrection that
left even the grave-clothes behind.
Lazarus, of course, will have eventually died permanently, as it were, when his time had come;
Jesus, as we know, remains alive today and lives within us through the power of the Holy Spirit.
Lazarus, of course, will have eventually died permanently, as it were, when his time had come;
Jesus, as we know, remains alive today and lives within us through the power of the Holy Spirit.
So what have these
stories to say to us, here in the 21st century?
We don’t find the idea of a fieldful of bones coming together and growing flesh particularly special –
computer animations have seen to that.
And we don’t expect to see the dead raised –
more’s the pity, in some ways;
maybe if we did, we would.
Then again, that doesn’t seem to be something God does very often in our world.
We don’t find the idea of a fieldful of bones coming together and growing flesh particularly special –
computer animations have seen to that.
And we don’t expect to see the dead raised –
more’s the pity, in some ways;
maybe if we did, we would.
Then again, that doesn’t seem to be something God does very often in our world.
But I do think that
there is something very important we can take away with us this
morning, and that is that it’s all God’s idea.
Our relationship with God is all his idea –
we are free to say “No, thank you”, of course,
Our relationship with God is all his idea –
we are free to say “No, thank you”, of course,
but in the final
analysis, our relationship with God depends on God,
not on us.
I don’t know about you, but I find that really liberating –
I don’t have to struggle and strain and strive to stay “on track”.
When I fall into sin, I am not left all by myself,
I don’t know about you, but I find that really liberating –
I don’t have to struggle and strain and strive to stay “on track”.
When I fall into sin, I am not left all by myself,
but God comes after me
and gently draws me back to himself.
I can just relax and be myself!
I can just relax and be myself!
Our relationship with
God is God’s idea.
It is God who breathes life into us.
It is God who brings us back when we go astray.
It is God who helps us to change and grow and become the people we were created to be, designed to be.
It is God who breathes life into the dry bones of our spirituality, who calls us out of the grave, who enables us to grow and change.
Amen, and thanks be to God!
It is God who breathes life into us.
It is God who brings us back when we go astray.
It is God who helps us to change and grow and become the people we were created to be, designed to be.
It is God who breathes life into the dry bones of our spirituality, who calls us out of the grave, who enables us to grow and change.
Amen, and thanks be to God!
No comments:
Post a Comment