I suggest you listen to the beginning of the recording, at least, as I included what would have been the children's talk had there actually been any children in church!
I wonder how many of you went to a Christmas party? We invited
someone to lunch on Christmas Day, but the only other party we went
to was Brixton Hill’s big annual Christmas dinner. For reasons I
won’t go into now, that was a bit of a disaster, with food having
to be cooked on one site and brought round to the other. Mostly by
R! But there was plenty of food; most people were able to take
a “goody bag” home with them.
That’s one of the
things about parties, or weddings,
or any other big event that
you’re hosting, or your church is,
have you got enough food
and drink for everybody –
to the point that, very often, there
is far too much, as there was at Brixton Hill this year!
And I
do know we got it right when it came to buying the sparkling wine for
our daughter’s wedding, many years ago now,
but I also
remember worrying lest we should, perhaps, have got another case….
As
it turned out, there was plenty –
we were even able to take a
couple of bottles home with us!
But it seems to have been
very far from the case for that poor host of the wedding at Cana we
have just read about.
As I understand it, back in the day
wedding feasts lasted two or three days, and a host would expect to
have enough food and drink to cater for the entire time.
But
something had gone badly wrong here.
We don’t know what had
happened, or why –
only that it had.
Such embarrassment
–
the party will be going on for awhile yet, but there is no
wine.
But among the wedding guests were a very special
family.
Mary, the carpenter's widow from Nazareth, and her
sons.
Cana isn't very far from Nazareth, only about twelve
miles,
but that's quite a good day's journey when you have to
rely on your own two feet to get you there.
So it's probable
that either the bride or the groom were related to Mary in some way,
especially as she seems to have been told about the disaster
with the wine.
And then comes one of those turning-point
moments in the Gospels.
Mary tells her eldest son, Jesus, that
the wine has run out.
Now, as far as we can tell, Jesus is
only just beginning to realise who he is.
John's gospel says
that he has already been baptised by John the Baptist,
which
implies that he has been out into the desert to wrestle with the
implications of being the Messiah –
and the temptations which
came with it,
and John also tells us that Simon Peter, Andrew
and some of the others have started to be Jesus' disciples
and
had come with him to the wedding.
But, in this version of the
story, Jesus hasn't yet started to use his divine power to heal
people and to perform miracles,
and he isn't quite sure that
the time is right to do so.
So when his mother comes up and says
“They have no wine,”
his immediate reaction is to say, more
or less,
“Well, nothing I can do about it!
It isn't time
yet!”
His mother, however, seems to have been ahead of
Jesus for once, on this,
and says to the servants, “Do
whatever he tells you!”
And Jesus, who was always very close
to God,
and who had learnt to listen to his Father all the
time,
realises that, after all, his mother is right
and
the time has come to start using the power God has given him.
So
he tells the servants to fill those big jars with water –
and
they pour out the best wine anybody there has ever tasted.
As
someone remarked, right at the fag-end of the wedding,
when
people are beginning to go home and everybody has had more than
enough to drink, anyway.
I don't suppose the bridegroom's
family were sorry, though.
Those jars were huge –
they
held about a hundred litres each, and there were six of them.
Do
you realise just how much wine that was?
Six hundred litres
–
about eight hundred standard bottles of wine!
Eight
hundred....
you don't even see that many on the supermarket
shelves, do you?
Eight hundred....
I should think Mary was
a bit flabber-gasted.
And it was such good quality too.
Okay,
so people drank rather more wine then than we do today,
since
there was no tea or coffee, poor them,
and the water could be a
bit iffy,
but even still, I should think eight hundred bottles
would last them quite a while.
And at that stage of the wedding
party, there's simply no way they could have needed that much.
But
isn't that exactly like Jesus?
Isn't that typical of God?
We
see it over and over and over again in the Scriptures.
The story
of feeding the five thousand, for instance –
and one of the
Gospel-writers points out that it was five thousand men, not counting
the women and children –
well, in that story, Jesus didn't
provide just barely enough lunch for everybody, quite the reverse
–
there were twelve whole basketsful left over!
Far more
than enough food –
all the disciples could have a basketful to
take home to Mum.
Or what about when the disciples were
fishing and he told them to cast their nets that-away?
The nets
didn't just get a sensible catch of fish –
they were full and
over-full, so that they almost ripped.
It's not just in
the Bible either –
look at God's creation.
You've all
seen pictures of the way the desert blooms when it rains –
look
at those millions of flowers that nobody, for a very long time, ever
knew were there except God.
Or look at how many millions and
millions of sperm male animals produce to fertilise only a few
embryos in the course of a lifetime.
Or where lots of embryos
are produced, like fish, for instance, millions of them are eaten or
otherwise perish long before adulthood.
And millions and
millions of different plant and animal species, some of which are
only now being discovered.
Or look at the stars!
All
those millions upon millions of stars, many with planets, some with
planets like our own that may even hold intelligent life.....
God
is amazing, isn't He?
And just suppose we really are the only
intelligent life in the Universe?
That says something else about
God's extravagance in creating such an enormous Universe with only us
in it!
Our God is truly amazing!
Scientists think
that some of the so-called exoplanets they have been discovering
lately might contain life, although whether or not that would be
intelligent life is not clear, and probably never will be.
So
how did God redeem such beings, assuming they needed redemption?
We
know that here, his most extravagant act of all was to come down and
be born as a human baby –
God, helpless, lying in a makeshift
cradle fashioned from an animal feeding-trough.
Having to learn
all the things that human babies and children have to learn.
Becoming
just like us, one of us, knowing what it’s like to work for his
living, what it’s like to be a condemned criminal and to die a
shameful death!
But God, God who could only allow Moses
the teeniest glimpse of his glory, or he would not have been able to
survive it, and even then his face shone for hours afterwards, this
God became a human being who could be captured and put to death.
You
know, sometimes I think the main function of the church is to help us
cope with God.
Perhaps the church, quite unwittingly, limits
God, or, like Moses, we’d not be able to handle it.
St Paul
prays that we might know “what is the immeasurable greatness of his
power for us who believe, according to the working of his great
power.
God put this power to work in Christ when he raised him
from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly
places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion,
and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in
the age to come.
And he has put all things under his feet and
has made him the head over all things for the church, which is
his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.”
The
Church, which is His body.
And yet we –
we the Church
–
are so bad at being His body.
We limit God.
We
limit God as individuals, saying “Thus far shall you come, and no
further!” We don’t allow God access to all of us, to every
particle of our being.
And we limit God as communities, as
churches;
We tell God what to do.
We tell God who God may
love, and who is to be considered beyond the pale.
We judge, we
fail to forgive, we withhold, despite the fact that Jesus said
“Do
not judge, and you will not be judged;
do not condemn, and you
will not be condemned.
Forgive, and you will be forgiven;
give,
and it will be given to you.
A good measure, pressed down,
shaken together, running over,
will be put into your lap;
for
the measure you give will be the measure you get back.”
And
yet we still hold back from God, both as individuals and as
communities.
I don’t mean just money –
although we do
that, too, despite the promise that if we:
“Bring the full
tithe into the storehouse, so that there may be food in my
house, and thus put me to the test, says the Lord of
hosts;
see if I will not open the windows of heaven for you and
pour down for you an overflowing blessing.”
But we hold
back ourselves from God.
We aren’t –
well, I know I’m
not, and I dare say I speak for you too –
we aren’t really
prepared to give ourselves whole-heartedly to God.
After all,
who knows what God won’t ask of us if we do?
We might even
have to give up our lives, as Jesus did!
Or worse, perhaps God
would say “No thank you!”
Perhaps we would be asked to go on
doing just exactly as we are doing –
how disappointing!
But
I wonder if it’s really about doing.
Isn’t it more about
being?
Isn’t it more about being made into the person God
created us to be?
Isn’t it more about allowing God into us
extravagantly, wholeheartedly…. I would say “completely”, but I
don’t think that’s quite possible.
God is simply too big,
and we would be overwhelmed.
Nevertheless, Jesus came, he
told us, so that we can have life, and have it
abundantly!
Abundantly.
Can we let more of God into our
lives, to be able to live more abundantly?
Do you dare?
Do
I dare?
Do we dare?
Amen!
No comments:
Post a Comment